Notes from the "Avant-Garde and Free Art" presentation by Matt Mitchell. First given at in June, 2019 at the IMC. This version updated for October, 2020.
The basic idea:
It can be hard to figure out where your art fits within the art world. And it can be painful to try to put it in the wrong place. One helpful way to think about galleries, artists, and art institutions is to divide them into two categories. One type of art intentionally risks being difficult to understand and it may require explanation or education to appreciate. Historically this type of art has been called 'Avant-garde Art'. The other type of art aims to be appreciated by larger audiences, free of explanation. For lack of a better term I call this art 'Free Art'.
Even though there hasn't been a good name to describe what I'm calling 'Free Art', there is a long tradition of dividing the art world into these categories. There is something fundamentally different about artwork that purposefully risks being difficult on the viewer vs. artwork that purposefully tries to be easy for a wide audience to appreciate. The way an artist approaches this question effects not only their art, but their entire life around making art.
One of the most well known essays about modern art deals with this question. But, unfortunately, it does so in a way that caused deep biases in the art community. Biases that can still be present in. In 1939 the critic Clement Greenberg wrote an article entitled "Avant-Garde and Kitsch". Even today this essay is still considered important reading in fine art programs across the country, if not across the world. In "Avant-garde and Kitsch" Greenberg argued that Avant-garde Art must be supported because it's difficult to appreciate. This part of his argument is illuminating and provocative. It'd be great if he stopped there. But, the unfortunate thing is that, in order to drive home his point that the Avant-garde was important, Greenberg made other forms of art into the enemy. He called easy-to-understand art 'Kitsch' as an insult. Further, he claimed that art that could be comprehended without explanation supported oppression of the masses. He claimed that easy to understand art was the hallmark of capitalist oppression, fascism, and authoritarian communism. Basically all that is bad.
Since the publication of "Avant-Garde and Kitsch" many artists and art institutions have actively worked against these biases of Clement Greenberg and people like him. However, it's still good to know about his essay because he so clearly outlines these two categories of art: there is the easy to understand and the difficult to understand.
Another reason it's important to know about this essay is that a sizable number of people in the avant-garde have been persuaded by this kind of thinking. Some do believe that more approachable art is inherently suspect. It's good to know this.
It is my position that both impulses have equal contributions to make. And it is wise to know which path you--and the people you're dealing with--are on.
------- Free Art:
Definition:Visual art oriented towards galleries and public spaces that is intentionally easy for a large audience to appreciate, free of explanation. It includes these categories: Low Brow, Street Art, Academic painting, Neo Classicism, Contemporary Symbolism, Imaginative Realism, Pop Surrealism, Contemporary Gothic.
About the Lists Below: All of these lists are partial lists. They're not meant to be the total picture. In both categories, Free Art and the Avant Garde, the focus is on Figurative Narrative art.
Artists used as examples in the SmArt School Lecture, October 2020
Galleries Many thanks to Justin Lawrence DeVine who has helped expand this list through offering an editable spreadsheet to the community on line. You can find that updating version of the Free Art gallery listhere
Definition:Google English Dictionary says "new and unusual or experimental ideas, especially in the arts, or the people introducing them." For the purposes of this discussion we'll define Avant-garde Art as this: "art oriented towards galleries and public spaces that intentionally risks being difficult to understand and may require explanation or education to appreciate." Avant-garde Art is often referred to by other names: Modern Art, Contemporary Art, Art World Art, High Art, or Fine Art. But all those names are not as clear as the term Avant-garde.
Another trait of Avant-garde Art that I din't spend enough time on, is that it tends to be idealistic. In the best situations it can be a place full of thoughtful provocations and attempts at leadership on how to achieve equality and a better world.
Artists used as examples in the SmArt School Lecture, October 2020
A few more artists of interest (this list could be huge, this is just a start)
Kerry James Marshall Vera Grivi Trey Abdella Hiba Schabaz Barkely Hendricks Walton Ford Chuck Close Vanessa German Bo Bartlett Kara Walker Tomoo Gokita Jim Shaw Jordan Casteel Eva Beresin Gerhard Richter Wayne Thiebold Philip Pearlstein Eric Yahnker Sophia Narrett Elliot Purse Charlie Billingham Sarah Slappey Kyle Dunn Betty Tompkins Judith Linhares Walter Robinson Austin Lee
Galleries Figurative Narrative artwork is very popular in the avant-garde gallery scene now. Almost every gallery will be open to showing it. So I am listing here some of the galleries that have stood out to me as having a particular long term interest in avant-garde figurative work. This is by no means an exhaustive list.